The Pitfalls Of A Second Date At Las Vegas

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 2:20pm CST

User Avatar Latest Nascar News And Info! By Luke, Thunder Lounge
Published on Thunder Lounge.




If you’re new around here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

New Hampshire Motor Speedway. Credit: Streeter Lecka/Getty Images

With every advancement in dates for a NASCAR track, someone loses out. Las Vegas hosting two races per season would not be an exception to this. In order for the folks at Las Vegas Motor Speedway to benefit from a second date, someone will lose out. More than just one “someone” as well.

As it stands now, that potential loss lies at the feet of SMI’s recently purchased New Hampshire Motor Speedway, which is unfortunate.

Read more of this »

Read more of this article »

* 2 comments. Add your 2 cents!.

Filed Under: Las Vegas, Nascar, New Hampshire, Sprint Cup, Texas, Tracks

Tagged As: , , , ,



Trackback URL for: The Pitfalls Of A Second Date At Las Vegas




User Avatar By Luke, Thunder Lounge
Tuesday February 26, 2008
10:44am CST
Published on Thunder Lounge.




Las Vegas Crowd; Credit: Tiffany Brown.

We all know Bruton Smith bought New Hampshire, renamed it to fit within the SMI namig Scheme (New Hampshire Motor Speedway), changed the logo, and is spending money in addition to the $340 million price tag for the track.

What has run rampant since is that Bruton Smith didn’t necessarily buy the track, but bought the two coveted Cup dates that it had for the sole purpose of moving one of those dates to Las Vegas Motor Speedway. Oh, that would be $170 million for each Cup date, if you’re counting.

Was it worth it for SMI, and will it be worth it for Las Vegas in return? It very well could be, and a profitable move at that.

Read more of this »

Read more of this article »

* 2 comments. Add your 2 cents!.

Filed Under: Las Vegas, Nascar, New Hampshire, Sprint Cup, Tracks

Tagged As: , , ,



Trackback URL for: Why A Second Date At Las Vegas Will Work